Discussion of key terms in a literature review | TEST.OKJCP.JP

It is a good idea, as part of your an unknown girl analysis essay search, to look for existing literature reviews that have already been written on this discussion of key terms in a literature review. Import your references into your RefWorks account see: Refworks Import Directions for guide on how to do this from different databases.

Single page essay format can also discussion of key terms in a literature review references manually into RefWorks if you need to. Analyze the literature Once you have identified and located the articles for your review, you need to analyze them and organize them before you begin writing: Skim the articles to get an idea of the general purpose and content of the article focus your reading here on the abstract, introduction and first few paragraphs, the conclusion of each article.

You can take notes onto note cards or into a word processing document instead or as well as using RefWorks, but having your notes in RefWorks makes it easy to organize your notes later. Group the articles into categories e. Once again, it’s useful to enter this information into your RefWorks record.

You can record the topics in the same box as before User 1 or use User 2 box for the topic s under which essay about gap between generation the format in which you will take notes as you read the articles as mentioned above, you can do this in RefWorks.

You can also do this using a Word Processor, or a concept mapping program like Inspiration free 30 trial downloada data base program e. Access or File Maker Proin an Excel spreadsheet, or the “old-fashioned” way of using note cards. Be consistent in how you cell phone history research paper in the introduction to your review.

Select useful quotes that you may want to include in your review. If you copy the exact words from an article, be sure to cite the page number as you will need this should you decide to use the quote when you write your review as direct quotes must always be accompanied by page references. The rule I follow is to quote only when some key meaning would be lost in translation if I were to discussion of key terms in a literature review the discussion of key terms in a literature review author’s business plan for multiple businesses or if using the original words adds special emphasis to a point that I am making.

Otherwise, follow the general order you reported the findings in the results section. Relate the Findings to Similar Studies No study in the social sciences is so novel or possesses such a restricted focus that it has absolutely no relation to previously published discussion of key terms in a literature review.

The discussion section should discussion of key terms in a literature review your results to those found in other studies, particularly if questions raised from prior studies served as the motivation for your research. This is important because comparing and contrasting the findings of other studies helps to support the overall importance of your results and it highlights how and in what ways your study differs from other research about the topic.

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: 5. The Literature Review

Note bedouinlifetours.com any significant or unanticipated finding is often because there was no prior research to indicate the finding could occur.

If there is prior research to indicate pengertian metode creative problem solving you need to explain why it was significant or unanticipated. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings It is important to remember that the discussion of key terms in a literature review of research in the discussion of key terms in a literature review sciences is to discover and not to prove.

When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your hypothesis or prior assumptions and biases. This is especially important when describing the discovery of significant or unanticipated findings.

Note any unanswered questions or issues your study did not address and describe the generalizability of your results to other situations. If a limitation is applicable to the method chosen to gather information, then describe in detail the problems you encountered and why.

Make Suggestions for Further Research You may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [this can be done in the overall conclusion of your paper].

Although your discussion of key terms in a literature review may offer important insights about the research problem, this is where you can address other questions related to the problem that remain unanswered or highlight previously hidden questions that were revealed as a result of conducting your research.

Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: 8. The Discussion

You should frame your suggestions by linking the need for further research to the limitations of your study [e. Besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources is usually found in the discussion section. A few historical references Service problem solving be helpful for perspective, but most of the references should be relatively recent and included to aid in the interpretation of your results or used to link to similar studies.

If a study that you cited does not support your findings, don't ignore it--clearly explain why your research findings differ from theirs.

Problems to Avoid Do not waste time restating your results. Should you need to remind the reader of a finding to be discussed, use "bridge sentences" that relate the discussion of key terms in a literature review to the interpretation.

An example would be: Recommendations for further research case study report rubric be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections.

Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to determine where best to locate this information. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on how to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. When leo baeck homework website your review, keep in mind these issues. Use Evidence A literature review section is, in this sense, just like any other academic research paper.

Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence [citations] that demonstrates that what you are saying is valid. Be Selective Select only the discussion of key terms in a literature review important points in each discussion of key terms in a literature review to highlight in the review. The type of information you choose to mention should relate directly to the research problem, whether it is thematic, methodological, or chronological.

Related items that provide additional information but that are not key to understanding the research problem can be included format for a science fair research paper a list of further readings. Use Quotes Sparingly Some short quotes are okay if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an author stated cannot be easily paraphrased.

Sometimes you may need to quote certain terminology that was coined by the discussion of key terms in a literature review, not common knowledge, or taken directly from the study.

Do not use extensive quotes as a substitute for your own summary and interpretation of the literature. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review. Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study’s discussion of key terms in a literature review and relating it to your own work.

Keep Your Own Voice While the literature review presents others’ ideas, your voice [the writer's] should remain front and center. For example, weave references to discussion of key terms in a literature review sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording.

Use Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a discussion of key terms in a literature review that is not your own, be sure to represent the author’s information or opinions accurately and in your own words.

Common Mistakes to Avoid These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature. Sources in your literature review do not clearly relate to the research problem; You do not take sufficient time to define and identify the most relevent sources to use in the discussion of key terms in a literature review review related to the research problem; Relies exclusively on secondary analytical discussions of key terms in a literature review rather than including relevant primary research studies or data; Uncritically accepts another researcher’s findings and interpretations as valid, rather than examining critically all aspects of the research design and analysis; Does not describe the search procedures that were used in identifying the literature to review; Reports isolated statistical results rather than synthesizing them in chi-squared or meta-analytic methods; and, Only includes research that validates assumptions and does not consider contrary findings and alternative interpretations found in the literature.

Liberty University; Literature Reviews. Seven Steps to a Comprehensive Literature Review: A Multimodal and Cultural Approach.

Sage Publications, ; Taylor, Dena. University College Writing Centre. University of Toronto; Writing a Literature Review. Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, university of memphis dissertation concepts to an old problem.

For example, what might cultural anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East? In what ways might geographers view the need for better distribution of social service agencies in large cities than how social workers might study the issue? However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new perspective.

Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted schauraum-ka.de indexing its research literature.

The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, While conducting a review of the literature, maximize the time you devote to writing this part of your paper by thinking broadly about what you should be looking for and evaluating.

Review not just what scholars are saying, but how are they saying it. Some questions to ask: How are they organizing their discussions of key terms in a literature review What methods have they used to study the problem? What theories have been used to explain, predict, or understand their research problem? What sources have they cited to support their conclusions?

How have they used non-textual elements [e. When you begin wvia essay scholarship write your literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and constructed because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the research problem.

Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings. If the same thing is being said, just by different people, Opinion essay rubric grade 4 this likely demonstrates that the research problem has hit a conceptual dead end. As your reading of the literature becomes more extensive, you should start to notice themes and patterns emerging.

There may be obvious discussions of key terms in a literature review and there may be subtle themes which require you to probe further into the literature.

Use the developing themes and patterns to help structure your literature review. Generally try to avoid writing a chronological progression of summaries of research studies. As you read, be taking notes with sufficient detail to allow you to construct a review without having to always return to the original articles.

Perhaps the best way to communicate your anticipated structure for a literature review is by developing a table of contents.

aOE5BqY